| Portfolio | Lower risk/return | Medium risk/return | Higher risk/return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Growth assets (shares, property) | 30% | 50% | 70% |
| 2. Income assets (cash, fixed interest) | 70% | 50% | 30% |
| 3. Total | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 4. Expected before-tax nominal return | 7.4% | 8.2% | 9.0% |
| 5. Expected after-tax nominal return | 5.0% | 5.6% | 6.1% |
| 6. Less fees (after tax) | >0.9% | 1.0% | 1.1% |
| 7. Less inflation | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| 8. Expected after-tax real return | 2.1% | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| 9. Expected after-tax real return in any one year is likely to be | -0.6% to 4.8% | -1.7% to 6.8% | -2.8% to 8.8% |
[no-glossary]
Source: Frank Russell Company (NZ) Ltd, Investment Consultants. Neither Frank Russell Company (NZ) Ltd nor the Retirement Commission can provide any guarantee of returns on investments, but this table is based on extensive research.
Over the long term higher risk products will generally provide higher returns (see line 4).
A note of warning. The figures in this chart are based on average investment returns over a very long period and also average fee rates, tax rates, and inflation rates. In the market place at any time there will be products and schemes within each category which perform better or worse than average for a number of reasons, including:
The tax treatment of different products can vary as can the tax rate payable by individual savers.
So don't use this chart as a strict guide to how any particular product will perform.
You may not be impressed with the relatively small difference between the net results in line 8. But 0.9% over and above 2.1% return is actually 42% better than the original result.